VT City of Victoria Texas, You are Here-by Notified of Legal Action Against You

Protective Order Request – *CIVIL LIBERTY Law Suit Against The City of Victoria Texas

Notice To: The City of Victoria Texas



You Are Being Sued this day 13 in the month of January on the year 2010.
NO. 10-1-69591-C
Filed 10 JAN 13 PM 1:19
Cathy Stuart
District Clerk
Victoria County Texas


It will be to the above to defend its self of accusation as described here in as a form of discrimination used against the accuser through Equal Rights using forms of civil harassment not adhering to that of the disabled but by inhibition in inhumane practice in the manipulation of Natural Law enforcement as being provoked and against conforming to justifiable attempt in as such is to provide due cause and consideration under condition and expressed situation of intent.
Equal Rights (circumstantial harassment) *CIVIL LIBERTY
Filing Content of the Law Suit: Robin M. Holy (prosecution shall be known by the term State) vs. the City of Victoria Texas (shall be known as defendant)
State statutes …..


Opening Statement:
It is to the State that it shall be to provide proof without reasonable doubt of ongoing sustained trait exhibitionism >
“as to be maneuverability positioned in disadvantage“


Purpose of said Law Suit: To avoid wrongful injustices (personal and contradicting to any perceivable humanitarian future events)


evidence: 1.) Prior acts of ongoing deviant sexual behavior (Class C Misdemeanor) within the duty of official (Ratcliff) ongoing City infra structure.
evidence: 2.) The enactment of detailed concurrent timely statutory scheme to induce stress under the delusion of oppression with intent to extract financial gain through the use of intimidation and or manipulation of law contrary to exclusions. That being the best interest of the State.
continued ……




Exhibit 1 – Reasonable Intent
Exhibit A – http://VictoriaTexas.ORG (web site)
The central purpose of the Equal Protection Clause “is to prevent the States from purposefully discriminating between individuals on the basis of race.” While the guarantees of “equal protection” and “due process of law” may overlap, the spheres of protection they offer are not coterminous. Rather, the right to “‘equal protection of the laws’ is a more explicit safeguard of prohibited unfairness than ‘due process of law.’” It is aimed at undue favor and individual or class privilege, on the one hand, and at hostile discrimination or the oppression of inequality, on the other. It was not intended, however, “to interfere with the power of the state . . . to prescribe regulations to promote the health, peace, morals, education, and good order of the people….”



Exhibit 2 – Conflicting Interest (Moral Turpitude)
Exhibit B – http://VictoriaTx.US (web site)
The State contends the statute advances a legitimate state interest, namely, preserving public morals. One fundamental purpose of government is “to conserve the moral forces of society.” In fact, the Legislature has outlawed behavior ranging from murder to prostitution precisely because it has deemed these activities to be immoral. Even our civil law rests on concepts of fairness derived from a moral understanding of right and wrong. The State’s power to preserve and protect morality has been the basis for upholding such diverse statutes as requiring parents to provide medical care to their children, prohibiting the sale of obscene devices, forbidding nude dancing where liquor is sold, criminalizing child endangerment, regulating the sale of liquor, and punishing incest. Most, if not all, of our law is “based on notions of morality.”

Cross Examination

___________________________________ ___________________________________ ________________
Closing Argument: This represents action as being not ignorant of the law, but of notice of continuing lack and adherence to regulatory worth by the defendant (City of Victoria) as abiding and as which has exhibited as being introduced hereby by the State (Robin M. Holy) evidence. In Consideration, the State asks in compensation that the sum of ninety nine million u.s. dollars be awarded the State (Robin M. Holy) by the defendant (City of Victoria, Texas) without ability to appeal in the due process of justice perceived to avoid further hardship at cost upon the State.

CONTACT *NOTE: This is a Civil Liberty law suit
Robin M. Holy
502 Clay Dr.
Victoria, Texas 77904
Home Phone: 361.582.0702
email: email@VictoriaTx.us

tags: Law Suit, Victoria Texas, plaintiff, defendant, discrimination, "harassment"





track back: http://bit.ly/7ZEhEp
leeches rank drunk